# Are Sovryn funds/resources leeched into "separate ventures" or private wallets?

**URL:** <https://forum.sovryn.com/t/are-sovryn-funds-resources-leeched-into-separate-ventures-or-private-wallets/2810>\
**Category:** General Commons\
**Created:** [February 18, 2023, 7:51am UTC](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/are-sovryn-funds-resources-leeched-into-separate-ventures-or-private-wallets/2810 "2023-02-18T07:51:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Daneo](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.sovryn.com/daneo/32/1244_2.png) [@Daneo](https://forum.sovryn.com/u/Daneo)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2024, 11:23am UTC](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/are-sovryn-funds-resources-leeched-into-separate-ventures-or-private-wallets/2810/22 "2024-12-31T11:23:28Z")

</div>

No, Sovryn Financial is another example of a promising venture that just petered out silently. From what I understood back then, it was the attempt of creating bank- and user-friendly BTC finance services, including BTC on-/off ramps, using the Sovryn Protocol on Rootstock.

[Previous page](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/are-sovryn-funds-resources-leeched-into-separate-ventures-or-private-wallets/2810.md?page=1)