I see two levels of discussion in the dojo :
- Architectural Consideration: From an architectural standpoint, it makes sense to decouple SOV services from BOS services because they provide two different kinds of value (e.g., financial services vs. infrastructure services).
- Value Distribution: The key question is how, and to what extent, the value generated by BOS can be distributed to SOV holders.
To keep the discussion constructive, we should focus on:
- Determining an appropriate percentage of BOS value ( 10% enough ?) to be allocated to SOV holders.
- Exploring other methods for SOV holders to capture the value generated by BOS (such as through gas fees).
- Considering what kind of governance mechanisms (bitocracy) are possible for SOV holders regarding BOS decisions that could impact Sovryn.
Regarding the distribution of BOS value, one idea could be to mirror BOS and SOV staking. For example:
If I have staked #n SOV for x years, then at the time of BOS launch, the system could lock #f(n) BOS for x years for me, allowing me to benefit from BOS staking rewards.
Let’s discuss this further