# Sovryn Tokenomics - Taskforce

**URL:** https://forum.sovryn.com/t/sovryn-tokenomics-taskforce/2467
**Category:** General Commons
**Created:** [April 5, 2022, 5:38am UTC](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/sovryn-tokenomics-taskforce/2467 "2022-04-05T05:38:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DMAN](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f0a364/32.png) [@DMAN](https://forum.sovryn.com/u/DMAN)
#### Post date: [April 8, 2022, 5:12am UTC](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/sovryn-tokenomics-taskforce/2467/14 "2022-04-08T05:12:12Z")

</div>

> [@CrypTut](#):
>
> Hi Yago, great that you still want to talk about.
> 
> However, the proposed SIP from yesterday had really valid points and **a lot** of people in your community say they are in support of it.
> 
> From the AMA you did, I thought you suggested to lock tokens for 10 years? 🔐
> 
> Then there is the suggestion to change the time lock on staking, as you also posted here.
> 
> And… the need for change of User Interface/Experience, which seems to be agreed upon by all.
> 
> So why do you want this task force? A **majority** of (y)our community already told you they would like to see these changes being implemented. A **minority** with the _majority_ of the tokens and VP maybe don’t. You see where I’m going?
> 
> It feels only Sovryn to talk about it, sure… but changes (that where suggested) are really needed to make us **more** Sovryn. That can only be achieved if you’re really prepared to meet your community half way, because we all know you hold the VP amount against the community in numbers. Based on the AMA I felt you was going to meet your community, but now I feel that I am not convinced yet. On this point I am not the only one and that’s important. Community remembers, like a bunch of elephants 🐘😄
> 
> So let’s keep talking Yago, but let’s not change the narrative on the three points that so many of us ask for. And please don’t be mistaken: we all Sovryns and Sovryns are in for the long run. Only long run doesn’t mean not having short term expectations and vision to steer us away from all the trouble our beloved project finds itself in. And let’s agree that Sovryn is in trouble.
> 
> Thank you.

Let me tell you why, even after proposing it as willing to accept the 10 year lockup of the team tokens and others that dillute the tokenomics, Yago is not willing to accept it:

His modus-operandi is if he disagrees he doesn’t directly tell you like myself “go fuck yourself, I’m not going to do it”. In a honest, but confrontational way.

No.

Yago treats you for an idiot and uses his manipulation technique by simply saying “we will discuss it” we need to do a task force. We need to think about it.

EVEN AFTER you showed him with huge majority what you want.

As long as he doesn’t want it or he can’t call some big wallets to vote in his favor that are not known as team wallets (think of Pomp and such)… he will be doing “daos”, “task forces”, “discussions”…

until a point when in such discussions will remain only people who are so bored they have nothing else to do than to be a forum granny… and finally accept whatever he proposes.

You can vote now 100:1 in favor of a sip, he will still create these measures designed to manipulate you.

What’s the point of the SIP structure if sip is not good enough to make decision but he needs a task force or a dao to judge on this one in particular (the one that doesn’t come from him and touches his sensitive part).???

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.sovryn.com/t/sovryn-tokenomics-taskforce/2467)._