I would like to share a few thoughts and concerns below and hope Exchequer members can answer this:
-
Why wasn’t this SIP mentioned in the community call on Thursday? When such a substantial amount of SOV is involved, the way this SIP is presented seems extremely suspect to me.
-
Why are Exchequer members making it sound like the adoption pool funds are entirely designated for Exchequer? Although I respect the members of the Exchequer very much and they have often proven to act for the good of Sovryn, I think it is wrong and dangerous to give the Exchequer committee even more power.
The adoption pool has been held by Bitocracy since Sovryn launched. The Exchequer puts up budget proposals to get parts of this adoption funds from Bitocracy. See SIP 0019 - Exchequer Committee 2021 Budget
and even more relevant
SIPS/SIP-0015.md at main · DistributedCollective/SIPS · GitHub -
For a long time there has been talk of transferring contract ownerships to the Bitocracy. See SIP-46
SIPS/SIP-0046.md at john-light-patch-3 · DistributedCollective/SIPS · GitHub
Why should the control of the biggest Bitocracy fund be transferred to the Exchequer now instead of pushing for SIP-46?