SIP-00XX: Ratification of Temporary Revenue Redirection to Exchequer

Summary

This SIP ratifies and formalises the Exchequer Committee’s decision, announced on 17 February 2026, to temporarily redirect RBTC and ZUSD protocol revenue from staker distributions to the Exchequer treasury. It affirms that this measure is temporary, establishes an ongoing review framework, and sets the explicit goal of resuming — and ultimately maximising — revenue distributions to stakers as soon as conditions allow.

Background

On 17 February 2026, the Exchequer Committee announced a temporary pause of RBTC and ZUSD staking payouts, citing compressed treasury runway following the decline in BTC price. Distributions of BOS, SOV, MYNT, and OSSOV rewards were unaffected. Revenue already accrued remained available for withdrawal.

The Sovryn Financial Report covering Q4 2024 – Q4 2025 disclosed the following:

  • Average monthly operational burn during 2025 was approximately $274K, reflecting elevated spend on Origins development, Sovryn Layer, technical debt reduction, and settlement of prior-period liabilities.

  • The treasury balance stood at approximately $736K as of 31 December 2025, with a projected balance of approximately $395K by the end of Q1 2026.

  • A series of headcount reductions between November 2025 and February 2026 reduced the steady-state monthly burn to approximately $45–50K from April 2026 onward — an approximately 84% reduction.

  • Without revenue injection to the treasury, the protocol would not be sufficiently capitalised to ensure continued operations.

The decision to redirect revenue was taken by Exchequer under the authority delegated by SIP-0015, which established the Exchequer Committee and granted it discretion over treasury management within bounds approved by Bitocracy. While the decision falls within Exchequer’s delegated operational mandate, its significance to stakers warrants formal ratification by Bitocracy.

Motivation

This SIP seeks to:

  1. Ratify the temporary redirection.

  2. Bound the measure in time and scope so that stakers have clarity on its temporary nature.

  3. Establish a review cadence so that the redirection does not persist by inertia.

  4. Affirm the goal of resuming and growing staker revenue distributions.

Proclamation

Bitocracy hereby resolves as follows:

1. Ratification

Bitocracy ratifies the Exchequer Committee’s decision of 17 February 2026 to temporarily redirect RBTC and ZUSD protocol revenue from staker distributions to the Exchequer treasury for the purpose of funding protocol operations.

2. Temporary Nature

This redirection is explicitly temporary. It shall remain in effect only for so long as the Exchequer Committee determines it is necessary to maintain adequate treasury reserves for protocol security and operational continuity, subject to the review process described below.

3. Ongoing Review

The Exchequer Committee shall review the revenue redirection on a quarterly basis at minimum, with the first review to be completed no later than the end of Q2 2026. Each review shall consider:

  • Current treasury balance and projected runway at prevailing burn rate.

  • Protocol revenue trends (monthly and quarterly).

  • Progress toward the revenue targets described in Section 4.

  • Any material changes to the operational cost base.

The Exchequer Committee shall publish a summary of each quarterly review to the Sovryn forum, including the treasury balance, the preceding quarter’s revenue and expenditure at a category level, and its determination on whether the redirection should continue, be partially unwound, or be fully unwound.

4. Path to Resumption

The explicit goal of this measure is to create the conditions under which protocol revenue can be redirected back to stakers. The Exchequer Committee is directed to work toward resuming staker distributions as rapidly as is consistent with maintaining a prudent treasury reserve.

The Exchequer Committee should target a treasury reserve sufficient to cover a minimum of six months of steady-state operational costs. Once the treasury meets this threshold and the Exchequer Committee is satisfied that ongoing revenue sustainably exceeds ongoing costs, it should begin partial or full resumption of RBTC and ZUSD staker distributions, subject to a further SIP or Exchequer determination as appropriate.

Additional revenue streams — including those anticipated from the Sovryn Layer — should accelerate this timeline.

5. Staker Protections

Nothing in this SIP alters the right of stakers to withdraw revenue that accrued prior to the redirection taking effect. BOS, SOV, MYNT, and OSSOV distributions that were not paused shall continue unaffected.

6. Bitocracy Authority

Bitocracy reserves the right to amend or revoke the authorisation granted in this SIP at any time by a subsequent SIP. Nothing in this SIP expands the Exchequer Committee’s authority beyond what was granted by SIP-0015 and subsequent governance actions.

Rationale

A proclamation is the appropriate track because this SIP does not modify smart contract code, issue tokens, change parameters, or directly transfer treasury assets. It makes a governance statement ratifying an operational decision, establishing conditions and expectations around it, and affirming the path forward.

The quarterly review cadence balances the need for accountability with the practical reality that treasury and revenue conditions do not change week-to-week. The six-month reserve target provides a concrete benchmark without being so aggressive as to indefinitely delay resumption.

License

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

1 Like

At least you ignore all other findings around here,

to continue cosplaying dezentra show.

How much of your 50+% voting power you gonna use this time?

2 Likes
3 Likes
3 Likes

Thank you Yago for a positive response and action. The community has been completely demoralized lately - this is the community that is a big source of generating Sovryn revenue. This was a good olive branch and a positive path forward.

Can you please consider modifying this SIP (or a separate one if needed) to work towards a path of a percent of protocol revenue going into GovernorVault that can be distributed to exchequer provided a budget is submitted? That’s a long term sustainable solution to the problems Sovryn currently faces. From what you’ve shared it remains unclear how exchequer will ever return fees back to stakers if operations depends entirely on protocol revenue. Setting aside fees going forward seems prudent to everyone.

Hopefully you also recognize for anyone to trust the protocol now, all the contracts need to be owned by Bitocracy. Which leads to the next issue..

Most of us are aware leadership/founders addresses control now 54% of bitcoracy VP (as of yesterday). These addresses exhibit coordinated transactions that would never occur randomly if not controlled by a single party. I know there’s nothing wrong with you owning as much SOV as you do, but you must see others are not likely to purchase SOV and stake it knowing their vote means nothing. If bitocracy is decentralized in name only, you must recognize the problem that creates for anyone considering holding/staking/purchasing SOV or using Sovryn’s services entirely - especially Zero, a contract that holds millions of dollars worth of BTC. I don’t know how you solve this centralized problem, but I hope you can address it.

These are major issues, that without being resolved, I’m worried platform revenue is going to suffer significantly. If revenue disappears down to just lending and zero/amm arbitrage, I worry Sovryn won’t achieve anything close to last year’s revenue. That makes it very tough for fees to ever be returned to stakers and it seems to me creates somewhat of a negative loop.

Again THANK YOU for making positive efforts! I can’t stress enough, everyone wants to be on your team and support you guys.

3 Likes

Specifically this point.. How would bitocracy enforce anything if the redirection does persist forever?

I suppose I addressed this already, but it’s really a big problem that Bitocracy doesn’t control the contract redirecting the fees and Bitocracy is seemingly controlled by the same people who are currently redirecting the fees.

If you can solve this dilemma you have my support.

5 Likes

TL;DR: Bitocracy == Hypocracy

1 Like

I agree with Brianna, the contract address should be Bitocracy’s, and there is no real argument against that. It should “Need” a vote to divert fee revenue.

However, I am also in support of this SIP and funding Sovryn. As long as there is a clear path back to rewarding Stakers, or buy/burning SOV in the future. Leadership could easily start using more funds as the Treasury increases, and just claim “well, we never got to the 18 month runway”. Which I think would be solved by SIP. Spending 4 Mil in 2 years is wild, and while none of you are admitting it, someone either A. Fucked something up, or B. Did something they shouldn’t have with Sovryn Treasury.

It’s a bit weird you guys would feel the need to be shady about that, but it doesn’t take a genius to see it doesn’t take $4mill to build origins. But, here in Sovryn world nothing can ever be transparent. It has to be shady to some degree for some reason.

Honesty isnt as difficult as you guys make it seem.

4 Likes

In fact, if there was fuckery, it would show real character and actual leadership if you just owned it. Lay out exactly what happened, then give a clear path to fixing it. That’s how a man with honor operates.

Right now, all we’ve got is speculation backed by half-baked, quasi “investigations” from the community.

So let’s keep it simple, answer this:

  • Who fucked up?

  • What exactly did they do?

  • How are you fixing it?

  • When does Bitocracy actually begin (not this fake shit we have now)?

And for any admins getting worked up over my language, relax. You know me. You know I’m Sovryn. But this shady behavior you’re feeding us is 100% pure horseshit.

At this point, I’ve got serious doubts about BoS too, it’s starting to feel like a rinse-and-repeat scam.

3 Likes

There is no smoke without a fire.

Exchequer either gambled the Sovryn treasury and blew up the account, or, stole the funds outright and redirected them elsewhere.

Yago, every day that you claim to practice good faith while continuing to hide from any accountability for the shocking discoveries the community has made, your nose just grows a little longer, and this projects’ pulse beats a little slower.

Ironically, your defense is to chop off your nose to spite your own face. As a controlling staker in complete denial and avoidance of whatever truth is being withheld, that is akin to what you are doing, dragging the project down just so that you don’t have to admit any wrongdoing, devaluing your own controlling stake just to protect your ego. But that nose just keeps on growing back, and getting longer. May I suggest Pinocchio as recommended viewing - a valuable life lesson there for you.

1 Like

Community Call: Today!

Reminder: We are hosting a Community Call today to discuss the financial report and the roadmap. I invite all present in this thread and forum to join and speak.

Today, March 26th, 4pm UTC: https://discord.com/events/729675474665603133/1484249455539654736

See you there.

Will it be recorded, as I missed this message.

Oh we have roadmap?

Is roadmap meant to be: redirecting all staker fees to exchequer to keep the protocol iddling around indefinitely at current state?

..and then finally let it cease in silence, cause fees stall as no one uses it anymore and can’t cover bills ? Sounds like a solid plan.

So none of these got answered?

Sovryn is dead?

1 Like

Correct, Yago instead chose to gaslight everyone who questioned his transparency and also set a new precedent which is that he is not interested in addressing concerns going forward. He labelled current concerns including Brianna’s public disclosures as conspiratorial. He wasted 45 minutes of our time trying to justify changes to the fee-sharing contract, even though there was broad consensus around this already before the call, using this as a complete red herring, which consumed the call while he continued to ignore concerns over mounting evidence of fraud.

3 Likes

OK thank you… @yago allow us to unstake without penalty! Seeing as you and the team can make changes without the bitocracy then this should also be an easy fix for Sov… this way we can opt out of being scammed.